According to a user-provided Word document and Xiaohongshu screenshots, online users alleged that a cat-burning video recently circulated in connection with Xizhongbao Village, Yongquanzhuang Township, Yu Xian, Zhangjiakou, Hebei. GAM has not yet found a police notice, media report, or traceable original video link. This record therefore treats the matter as a screenshot-based online allegation, not as a confirmed identification of any individual.

The Allegation

The material alleges that the location was Xizhongbao Village, Yongquanzhuang Township, Yu Xian, Zhangjiakou, Hebei. Some online users said the act may have imitated the earlier Jieyang case and involved burning a cat and circulating video footage. The screenshots show a cage-like object, fire, smoke and a blurred central area, which are consistent with a possible animal-harm scene.

Screenshots alone cannot confirm the number of animals, the outcome, the identity of the actor, whether there were others involved, whether police were contacted, or whether local authorities have responded. The source material includes possible name, nickname and contact details, but this archive does not publish or treat them as confirmed identity.

What the screenshots show

The lead appears mainly through Xiaohongshu interface screenshots and possible video frames. One allegation/repost screenshot shows “07-15” and small text reading “22:15 Wednesday”; some video-interface screenshots show a phone status-bar time of “10:46”. Some users also said the incident itself may have happened several days before July 15, but GAM cannot confirm the exact date without an original post, video source, or public notice.

The screenshots also show some likes, comments, saves and shares. Those numbers only reflect the visible platform state at the time of capture and cannot replace an original URL or official record.

该图片涉及疑似动物伤害现场，默认遮罩。

查看图片

该图片涉及疑似动物伤害现场，默认遮罩。

查看图片

该图片涉及疑似动物伤害现场，默认遮罩。

查看图片

该图片涉及疑似动物伤害现场，默认遮罩。

查看图片

该图片涉及疑似动物伤害现场，默认遮罩。

查看图片

该图片涉及疑似动物伤害现场，默认遮罩。

查看图片

Why This Is Recorded

The absence of an original video source does not mean the lead should simply disappear. Animal-harm videos on social platforms may be reposted, deleted, throttled or fragmented quickly. Recording such a lead requires two boundaries at once: cruelty toward animals should be condemned and followed up; unverified private identity information should not be spread.

If a police notice, media report, original video link or platform post becomes available, this record should be updated. If later evidence shows that the allegation was wrong, GAM should correct the record as well. The purpose is not doxxing or mob harassment, but preserving a lead about possible cruelty while keeping discussion anchored to sources and facts.

Source Note

This article is based on a user-provided Word document and seven extracted screenshots, mainly showing Xiaohongshu interfaces and possible video frames.

Searches using Chinese and English keyword combinations across ordinary web search, X, Facebook, Instagram and Threads have not yet found an authoritative media report, police notice or original social-media link that can be directly cited.

Because the original source is not yet traceable, this is archived as an online allegation lead. Private phone numbers, full names, nicknames and address details that are not verified by public sources are not reproduced.