Recently, a Xiaohongshu user alleged that multiple stray cats in Wuxing Park, Changzhou, Jiangsu, may have been severely harmed. Screenshots provided to this site show the poster saying that there had been “more than ten” incidents in and around Wuxing Park, with abbreviated references to suspected throat-cutting and abdominal mutilation. In the comments, the poster also wrote that another cat with its abdomen opened had appeared. Because this site has not yet obtained a police notice, media report, or original post link, this article records the matter as an online allegation that remains unverified but highly concerning.

Capture d’un signalement en ligne ; peut contenir des images de maltraitance animale

Voir l’image

Capture d’un signalement en ligne ; peut contenir des images de maltraitance animale

Voir l’image

Capture d’un signalement en ligne ; peut contenir des images de maltraitance animale

Voir l’image

Capture d’un signalement en ligne ; peut contenir des images de maltraitance animale

Voir l’image

The allegation began with “Wuxing Park cats”

The Xiaohongshu screenshots show discussion around “Wuxing Park cats,” with search and comment indicators visible. The poster appears as “Yumu,” and the hashtags include Changzhou stray cats, rescue of stray cats and animals, opposition to animal abuse, Changzhou, and Wuxing Park.

In the post text, the poster alleged that there had been more than ten incidents at Wuxing Park and used abbreviations for suspected severe harm. Because some words appear to be abbreviated to avoid platform review, this archive records the matter only as suspected severe abuse, without expanding it into unverified scene details.

The central claim: not a single isolated event

The most important clue in the screenshots is the phrase “more than ten.” It shifts the concern from one stray cat suffering unknown harm to the possibility of repeated severe harm at the same public location. If accurate, the issue would involve not only animal rescue, but public-space safety, patrol, surveillance maintenance, and the handling chain after residents report concerns.

In later comments, the poster allegedly wrote that another cat with its abdomen opened had appeared. This suggests that, during the period of online discussion, some viewers believed similar incidents were continuing. This site cannot verify the number of animals or whether the same person was involved, but repeated severe-harm clues should not be dismissed.

Community self-help: rescue, fostering, and reporting

Some commenters immediately urged that the remaining stray cats be moved to safer places. One screenshot shows a comment calling for the remaining cats to be caught and fostered. This suggests that viewers understood the situation as an ongoing risk, not only as mourning for animals already harmed.

Another commenter suggested that reports should emphasize a bloody violent act in a public area, possible disturbance, and possible safety risks to children or pets, rather than simply saying that someone had killed cats. This reflects a common concern in animal-harm cases: people worry that reporting harm to stray animals alone may not receive enough attention, so they try to frame the issue through public safety.

Surveillance reportedly broken; handling remains unclear

The comments also discussed surveillance. A screenshot shows a commenter asking whether surveillance footage could be checked, and the poster replying that it was broken. Another commenter suggested calling 12345 to request repair of the surveillance system and asking park security to pay attention. If surveillance is unavailable in a public area, both tracing the perpetrator and preventing another incident become harder.

The claims that someone reported the matter, that reporting was not useful, and that surveillance was broken are still only statements from the screenshots. This site cannot infer that police failed to act or that park management was at fault. But from a public-governance perspective, repeated animal-harm clues, possible surveillance failure, resident reporting, and rescue requests should receive a clear response.

Position du site

Global Animal Memory strongly criticizes and condemns any cruel harm to animals. Even though this case still requires verification, repeated clues of severe harm to stray cats in a public park should not be treated lightly. Violence against animals also damages the public sense of safety.

This record is not meant to replace a police conclusion or encourage harassment. It exists so that public allegations, rescue appeals, and comment-thread clues are not lost in the speed of social platforms. We hope relevant local parties will verify the facts, respond to public concern, repair or check available surveillance, and assist rescuers in protecting the remaining stray cats around the park.

Sources et état de vérification

• Screenshots supplied by a user in a Word document, showing what appear to be Xiaohongshu posts and comment threads.
• OCR-readable text includes “Changzhou Wuxing Park,” “more than ten incidents,” “catch the remaining cats for fostering,” “can surveillance be checked,” and “broken.”
• As of publication, this site has not obtained a police notice, formal media report, or original Xiaohongshu link.
• If original links, police responses, media reports, or rescue-organization confirmations become available, this article will be updated as a follow-up record.

Suivi : selon des témoignages ultérieurs d’internautes

Selon des publications ultérieures d’internautes sur Xiaohongshu et d’autres plateformes, les services concernés de Changzhou auraient commencé à intervenir dans l’affaire des chats errants du parc Wuxing. La capture indique que plusieurs services ont coopéré toute la journée et que la police aurait finalement retrouvé la personne soupçonnée de maltraitance ; l’autrice du signalement dit avoir été appelée au poste après 23 h pour terminer une déposition.

Le même suivi indique qu’une dame qui aidait à nourrir les chats a placé 9 chats relativement sociables à l’hôpital vétérinaire Jinjian, en face du parc, pour vermifugation, examens de maladies infectieuses et soins de base. Des habitants proches auraient aussi souhaité adopter certains chats, et les frais d’examen seraient pris en charge par la partie protectrice. Un autre commentaire disait que le 12345 avait répondu et qu’un avis pourrait ensuite être publié sur un compte officiel.

À la date de cette mise à jour, ce site n’a pas vu de communiqué public officiel et n’a pas obtenu de matériau supplémentaire vérifiable avec davantage de certitude. Les informations ci-dessus sont donc conservées comme témoignages ultérieurs d’internautes, et non comme conclusion officielle. Si un communiqué policier, un reportage ou une explication publique d’une organisation de secours apparaît, cette archive sera complétée.